What's the difference between pro-active and aggressive in work? And what are the advantages and disadvantages of being pro-active and aggressive?

Question added by JAIME ESTRADA , Contracts Engineer (Contracts Management) , SRACO-SATORP
Date Posted: 2014/04/29

Upvote (1) Views (3) Followers (0) Answers (1) Report Question

by Sayed Adil , Deputy Group Manager , Titan Industries

Proactiveness is taking initiatives, whereas aggressiveness is taking the final call and going for the kill.

Proactiveness Pro's - Good planning, Project time saved, foreseeing trouble shooting,

Proactiveness Con's - hesistance, lost of resources in extra planning, Wrong foresee leading to misguidance.

Aggressive Pro's - Firm decisions, Clear directions, Project time saved.

Aggresive COn's - BAD PR sometimes, collegagues irritated by dictating terms, peaking early.

What are the Pros and Cons {advantages & disadvantages} of issuing bonds/debenture over stocks/shares, & which is more beneficial?
Top Answer: Pros of issuing bonds over debentures: 1. undiluted control <p&g ... See More

Answers (1)
Being a project manager what are the advantages/disadvantages to involve in every activity?
Top Answer: I believe that projet managers should not get involved in every activity as long as it goes as p ... See More

Answers (1)
How do you work normally whether pro-actively or re-actively and why?
Top Answer: I always work proactively before something is picked up by the clients which could result in being reacti ... See More

Answers (1)
What are the advantages & disadvantages of speaking (some) Arabic when working in the Middle East?
Top Answer: You should deffinetly know the basics, it's always good to know some comands and show respect to ... See More

Answers (13)

Do you need help in adding the right keywords to your CV? Let our CV writing experts help you.