Sometimes, I cannot determine that Employers needs a practical skilled person or a highly educated. Is it true?

The fact is employers need high talented people have experience a liitle bit more than education.

And for some special people the company may pay for them courses to increase their education.

But I think fully that educated person without experience has no value.

The reality of the experience vs. education debate is that no single argument can cover all the potential situations of job seekers, potential employers and career success.

1. Argument1: Higher Education only proves you can succeed in academia, not in a real-world job.

2. Argument2: Success in actual work means more than success in education.

3. Argument3: Work experience doesn't necessarily provide the skills you need for the next job you'll have.

4. Argument4: A higher degree guarantees a particular skill set (which can be translated into work skills).

To conclude, some lines of work demand higher education; others may demand a level of work expertise that a degree just doesn't offer.

I am bound to agree with this to a greater extent. Bureaucracy has a notorious habit of overlooking human characteristics that are ideal for a thriving working environment.

employers need highly talented people to have experienced a little bit more than education. skillful persons, they need to recruit

It depends on senario and company culture. It may be ture sometime or may be false. There cannot be any catagorical answer to it

It varies;as an organization it should possess a plan timme= linesometimes pill and other times Push "theoretically"